• About
  • The Constitution
  • Columnists
    • Karl Rove
    • Thomas Sowell
    • Walter Williams
  • Funny But True
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe

4politics.org

  • Next Generation
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Columnists
    • Doug Schoen
    • Thomas Sowell
    • Walter Williams
  • Solutions
  • Humor
  • Videos
  • Follow @4politics
You are here: Home / Business / The Dangers of Government Guarantees

The Dangers of Government Guarantees

September 9, 2008 by 4politics.org Leave a Comment

Monday, September 08, 2008

The Dangers of Government Guarantees
by Fred Thompson

I’ll bet it came as a surprise to most folks that the financial stability of the world as we know it depends upon the survival of a couple of outfits called Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Yet that’s what the so-called experts are telling us. Moreover, we taxpayers are now being asked to guarantee Fannie and Freddie’s tab, one that could make the $124 billion S&L bailout of the late 1980s look cheap.

So how did we get stuck with this bill? Well, Congress wanted to “do something” about what it saw as a “housing problem.” To them that meant that they should create an even bigger problem.

So Congress passed laws that made it easier for hopeful home-buyers to buy houses … even when they couldn’t afford them. Then the Fed and other regulators helped, in the form of easy money and loose credit standards for mortgages.

Not surprisingly demand for houses grew, home prices rose, lenders financed additional questionable mortgages, fueling even higher prices and so on. You get the picture. This is called a bubble.

Then an amazing thing happened – apparently impossible to foresee. Home prices did not continue to rise forever! Home prices came down and easy money dried up, causing the above mentioned cycle to reverse. In other words, the bubble burst.

So you’d think the in-over-their-heads homebuyers and the mortgage bankers would take the hit, and the market would right itself. No reason for an international meltdown here, right?

Not so fast my friends. Years earlier Congress established Fannie and Freddie as purchasers of these mortgages, which they could bundle up, repackage and sell to investors, freeing up more mortgage money. As government creations tend to do, the two companies grew until they either owned or guaranteed about half the nation’s $12 trillion dollars in mortgages.

Fannie and Fred were “government sponsored enterprises” which means heads they win, tails you lose. If they make money stockholders, creditors and Fannie and Freddie employees – some making millions annually – get the benefit. But now that mortgages have hit the skids, with mounting losses, the taxpayers potentially face trillions in exposure. This is because there is an “implicit” (read “actual”) government guarantee of Fannie and Freddie’s obligations and both are now too big to be allowed to fail. This is called the “bailout phase,” which will probably lead to a bigger bubble in the future.

Lost in this immense, complex mess is the root problem most people are missing: the government is gradually becoming the guarantor of seemingly every important aspect of American secular life, creating incentives and bureaucracies that cause failure and invite fraud.

In Fan and Fred’s case, it was in no one’s interest to turn off the bubble machine. Just the opposite. The system induced borrowers to take on financial obligations they could not afford and lenders to lower lending standards. Fannie and Freddie went along because their managers’ compensation depended on the firms’ short term financial performance. And investors continued to buy complex security packages they didn’t understand, because the securities were viewed as government-backed.

Heavy campaign contributions by those benefiting from this scheme induced Members of Congress to avert their gaze from the ugly mess that was unfolding.

You’d think we’d have learned by now: when the backstop of the federal treasury makes it easier for politicians, lenders, borrowers, welfare recipients, government contractors, or anyone else, to serve their own self interest at the expense of the taxpayer, many will do just that.

That is why we continue to see self-dealing, moral lapses, outright fraud and lack of management and oversight in a wide array of programs and government-sponsored entities, from housing to Medicare, education and the Small Business Administration, all costing taxpayers billions, even trillions of dollars.

Our Founding Fathers knew more than a little bit about human nature. It is one reason why in the Constitution, the federal government was given certain delineated powers and no others. I hate to burst another bubble, but our government simply doesn’t have the authority or the capability to be the guarantor or insurer of our every need or desire. Isn’t it time we started sending that message loud and clear to the big enablers in Washington?

Filed Under: Business

Comentary

The Treacherous Politics of the Fiscal Showdown

The Treacherous Politics of the Fiscal Showdown

However the government shutdown plays out, the GOP needs a serious debt-ceiling plan, quickly. They said they wanted to avoid it, but at the stroke of midnight Monday, four people got the government shutdown they wanted. President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wanted … Continue Reading

51% Think Deal To Avoid ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Likely by January 1

51% Think Deal To Avoid ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Likely by January 1

Wednesday, November 14, 2012 President Obama will hold a press conference today to push his deficit-cutting plan as lawmakers in Washington battle over ways to prevent the massive tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled for January 1.  Given the partisan bickering, a bare majority of voters … Continue Reading

Republicans

Lawmaker asks to be paid in gold

Lawmaker asks to be paid in gold

By KEVIN CIRILLI | 11/13/12 11:36 AM EST A Montana state lawmaker is asking that he be paid in gold coins because of his lack of faith in the U.S. dollar amid a rising deficit. Jerry O’Neil, a Republican just reelected in his northern Montana … Continue Reading

Mitt Romney’s 47 Percent: Who Does Not Pay Income Taxes?

Mitt Romney’s 47 Percent: Who Does Not Pay Income Taxes?

By AMY BINGHAM (@Amy_Bingham) Sept. 18, 2012 Mitt Romney gave up on winning support from nearly half of the American electorate in May, telling wealthy supporters at a private fundraiser that he could not hope to win the votes of the 47 percent of … Continue Reading

More Articles

  • Noonan: The Democrats’ Soft Extremism
  • Love lost: Ad urges Obama ‘break-up’ over golf, Clooney
  • Adviser: Romney thought Clint Eastwood was ‘funny’

About 4politics.org

Life’s experience, political common sense, passion to succeed, never satisfied but always happy.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MEMBER LOGIN

code
Al Sharpton Gets Meeting With President

Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle...

Putin threatens to cut off gas to Ukraine...

Clinton Foundation violated ethics agreement...

Obamacare Gruber fired from MA state health board...

Obama Said His First New Car Was A Jeep

Must Read Articles

Bill Gates Pushes Cashless Society

Bill Gates Pushes Cashless Society

Yuan spot price per USD hits record high

Yuan spot price per USD hits record high

Must Read Articles

China congratulates NKorea’s Kim on re-election

China congratulates NKorea’s Kim on re-election

Mexico asks court to reject Ariz. immigration law

Mexico asks court to reject Ariz. immigration law

Economic Myths, Fallacies and Stupidity

Economic Myths, Fallacies and Stupidity

Black SC Republican poised to go to Congress

Black SC Republican poised to go to Congress

A Big Thank You to Neal Boortz

Support 4politics.org Donate Today!

4Politics Links

  • America Now
  • American Solutions
  • Boortz.com
  • Erick On The Radio
  • FairTax.org
  • Heritage Foundation
  • NewsBusters
  • Opensecrets.org
  • The Charters of Freedom
  • The National Archives

More Politics

  • Alan Colmes Liberland
  • Doug Schoen
  • Herman Cain
  • Mark R. Levin
  • MichelleFields.com
  • Nealz Nuze
  • Politico
  • RedState
  • Rush Limbaugh
  • Thomas Sowell

News Outlets

  • ABC News
  • CBS News
  • CNN
  • Drudgereport
  • LA Times
  • MSNBC
  • NY Times
  • The Hill
  • Town Hall
  • Washington Post
  • WSBRadio

Comments

  • georgia guy on Harry Reid in hospital with broken ribs, facial bones
  • contribute on Shinseki faces bipartisan calls to resign after VA watchdog report
  • Jerry J. Johnson on Clinton rejects blame for financial crisis
2017 - 4politics.org